In 1895, a financial panic set off a run on the gold reserves that served as the basis of the U.S. currency. President Grover Cleveland called a meeting of advisers, including the nation’s most powerful financier, J.P. Morgan, to address the crisis.
Morgan sat silently as leaders from Congress and Cleveland’s cabinet offered plans that Morgan knew would fail.When asked for his suggestion, Morgan laid out a plan to save the Treasury. He offered to repatriate 3.5 million ounces of gold he controlled in Europe and agreed to take, in return, $65 million worth of 30-year government bonds.
Morgan then produced a legal memorandum showing that the govern- ment had authority to act as he proposed based on a little- known emergency law passed just after the Civil War.
Morgan’s proposal was adopted. His message gained power from the quiet way he communicated both his authority and expertise. Playing the Commander with finesse, he saved both the American and his own financial empire from a fiscal catastrophe.
The Promoter: Andrew Carnegie
When played ineffectively, the Promoter is all glad-handing and no substance. But when played well, this role features an outfront style and a gift for gaining and maintaining a wide circle of relationships.
In 1883, steel mogul Andrew Carnegie faced one of his first labor crises. He adopted a politically sophisticated negotiation strategy designed for delivery on the Rationality, Interest and Relationship channels.
He and his management team prepared a document that displayed the trade-offs between forcing layoffs and reducing wages. This analysis demonstrated that if wages were reduced 13 percent, the plant could remain in operation without lay- offs –– a key interest of the unions.
He offered to open his books so union leaders could see the financial con- straints the steel market was forcing on the business. He mobilized them as his allies. The union leaders accepted the deal and sold it to their members.
The Chess Player: John D. Rockefeller
In 1865, John D. Rockefeller found himself trapped in a partnership with four other men: Maurice, James and Richard Clark (all brothers) and Samuel Andrews. Rockefeller favored leveraging the partnership’s assets to invest in the oil business, but the Clarks repeatedly vetoed his ideas.
Rockefeller wanted to end the partnership, but the firm could be dissolved only if all partners consented. Therefore, Rockefeller went to work behind the scenes, lining up support from some banks, and then he provoked another quarrel over an oil industry investment.
Maurice Clark barked, “If that’s the way you want to do business, we’d better dissolve.” Catching his partners in their bluff, Rockefeller placed a formal notice in the morning paper stating that he and his partners had unanimously agreed to part ways.
By communicating in a moderate tone and appearing to play to his partners’ interests, Rockefeller arranged the situation so that his partners gave him exactly what he wanted.
The Advocate: Sam Walton
As Wal-Mart’s founder, Sam Walton could have ordered people to do what he wanted. But part of his genius was that he rarely forced an idea.
By protecting the self-esteem and autonomy of his executives, he was able to win their cooperation.
Take the idea of using “greeters.”Walton got this idea when visiting a Wal-Mart in Louisiana. He was met by an elderly man who said,“Hi! How are ya? Glad you’re here.” He discovered the store had experienced a shoplifting problem. Rather than offend the 99 percent of customers who were honest by posting a guard to check bags, the manager placed a friendly-looking older man out front to put shoplifters on notice that someone was watching.
Walton went back to Bentonville and told everyone about placing greeters in every store.A lot of people thought he’d lost his mind.Walton immediately gave credit for the greeters program to the people in the field who conceived it.Through his skilled advocacy, the greeters program has become an enduring, signature part of the Wal-Mart shopping experience.
The Problem of Authenticity
The need in persuasion to adapt to audiences raises an important ethical issue: authenticity.
Your personal credibility provides the foundation for influence. The authenticity paradox diminishes when you see that you cannot help being a somewhat “different person” depending on who you are interacting with.And your awareness of these various roles gives you a range of “authentic selves” to display in persuasion.